DN: Local political prisoners inspire activist thought

This article, written by the famous Lee Heerten, is basically about hippies and how in-tune to the world and its struggles they are. Some old hag spoke in Nebraska about the poor Black Panthers and how they were arrested because they were black, or something. Yeah, everyone in jail is innocent. We should take a poll.

Then it transitions into a "stand-up and fight," piece, saying that one person is weak, but many are strong. What a thought. And somewhere along the lines the war in Iraq became Rummy's war. Not too surprising considering he gets all his material off of the DNC website. But, lets imagine this is Donald Rumsfeld's war. He tricked this entire country into believing it was necessary to go into Iraq. What would he have had to do to accomplish this?

First, he would have a talk with the Muslims after WWII. He needed to get them extra pissed off about being kicked out of the shit hole area some of them lived in. He needed them so upset about it that the religion of peace would resort to murdering any and everyone they could.

Next, he would have to convince Jimmy Carter to avoid going into, and saving, Iran from the Ayatollah. Probably not a hard move considering the typical democrat's response is to sit and wait. But, this move is important because losing Iran means we have no allies in the middle east. Very important for his future plans.

After a little while off, Rummy would have to make his way to Iraq and have them develop biological weapons, and begin production on WMDs. At this time, in the early 90s, we had a President by the name of Bush in the office. Rummy knew that this president would go into Iraq if they threatened national security. The dictator of Iraq was killing innocent people, and it wouldn't have been a stretch to say he would try to kill other innocent people, outside of their state. We went into Iraq, but avoided going into Baghdad because we thought that leaving him crippled but in power would create stability. It did for a while, but they wouldn't remain crippled forever. While his plan seems to have been complete, not going into Baghdad left a bad taste in his mouth.

Something else Rummy might have done, which has been swept under the rug, is sneak into President Clinton's, Joe Biden's, Hillary Clinton's, John Kerry's, etc. speech writer's office and add-in that Iraq has, and is working on, WMDs. And, that it is critical that we stop them from advancing their technology because these weapons in the hands of Hussein are very dangerous. He was trying to push us into another war in the 90s, but it failed because the Democrats have short attention spans and forgot they ever said those things.

So, Rummy needs to have a little talk with UbL about a certain date in September. Rummy so badly wants to go to war with Iraq, that he helps develop a plan to crash some planes in some tall buildings. This will cause us to invade Afghanistan, spreading out all the terrorists into nearby countries, one such country being Iraq. Iraq, with their aforementioned WMDs, now has a buyer living inside their country. If we don't act on them right away, then the terrorists that Rumsfeld trained will have the capability to blow us to smithereens.

Donald Rumsfeld has one hell of a future outlook when he began "his" war when he was only 13 years old. I must give it to him. He had a plan and stuck with it.

But back to the article at hand.

What the hell took this totally awesome old lady so long to make it to Nebraska? Were we not willing to give her the requested speaking fee all those years?

Update: My madre had a couple things to add:

First, if she's on the FBI's top ten why didn't some one call them and tell them she was there? All who saw her were abetting a criminal. I don't think that's such a wonderful way to start your article, that she is on the FBI's most wanted as if that's something impressive.

Second, I hope he really researched the men that are imprisoned wrongly. Not to say they are there under false pretenses, but the one or two things he mentioned in the article do not turn cases around. They need clearer evidence that proves the last decision was wrong based on the info at the time. Unless some other evidence has been brought forward they are left in jail. If they were wrongly imprisoned we owe them a lot, just like the men and women serving in the military that don't and won't get half the attention these two jailbirds get.

Thirdly, boy if the case of voting the dems into power helps, then maybe they will release all those "innocent" people stuck in jail. We think that Iraq is bad wait until the "unjustly imprisoned" are freed. I don't think that changing the status of congress will help free those men, it's called "evidence" that will free them, well maybe the dems have been hiding it all this time, who knows...you know they want to look good so freeing some prisoners will be helpful to their wonderful cause.